The Notes Her Brother Left

Virgil Walker | Sola Veritas

Church had just let out, the sermon still ringing in her ears, when she stopped to talk with Pastor Darrell.

I noticed her and her husband from the corner of my eye and let them have the moment. But as I looked closer, I could see it on her face, the kind of seriousness that tells you something is wrong before a word is spoken. Darrell waved me over and told me what was happening.

This dear sister had come to share a heartbreak. Her brother had begun taking hormones to transition. He had imbibed the gender ideology, and now he had committed to doing more than talk about it. As evidence of how far he had gone, she opened her phone. She had photographed sticky notes, yellow squares of his handwriting, left for the family to read. He had written them in response to a pamphlet the church had produced, a pamphlet that was simply trying to teach what a human being is. She had photographed each one. I asked her to send me the notes so I could sit with them.

I want to tell you what those notes said, and then I want to tell you the harder thing, which is why I could not answer her as quickly or as cleanly as she hoped.

The first note read: “God created transness so that we could participate in the act of creation.” The second leveled a charge, “doctrinal oversight due to erroneous philosophical framing of the text.” The third was the longest. “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The Bible does not explicitly negate nonbinary or trans identities, and thus holds space for them, allowing the church to respect trans human rights.”

Her brother is now taking hormones. He believes he is becoming a woman. He is not. No chemical reorders what was set in the body before he drew his first breath. But that sentence, true as it is, was not what she needed first, and I knew it.

She asked me a simple question. What do I do?

I did not answer right away, and I want to be honest about why.

This is the thing I most want you to hear, and I want to be honest about how I come to say it.

I am not new to these arguments. I have stood in front of rooms across this country and traced them back to their sources, to Simone de Beauvoir and Judith Butler, to the clinical work of John Money. I have studied the social contagion that has pulled so many adolescent girls toward this ideology, and I can tell you where the ideas were born and why they spread. I understand the architecture of this thinking better than most people you will ever meet.

None of that is what wins the day.

I learned this early, not slowly, because I loved this child long before any error entered the picture, and the error has not loosened that love by an inch. When someone you love embraces something false, your love does not weaken. It narrows. It burns off the lesser thing, the hunger to be proven right, and presses down hard on what actually matters. If knowing the arguments could rescue a person, the child I am thinking of would already be standing where my wife and I raised them to stand. I have had to sit with this reasoning as a father before I ever sat with it as a pastor. Mastery of the ideas is the thing I am best at. It is not the thing that saves.

So when this woman asked what to do, she was not asking a man with a tidy answer. She was asking a man who carries the same weight she does.

That is why I want to slow down before we touch the notes themselves.

Look again at what the three of them are actually doing. They are not three arguments. They are one move, performed three times. Each one manufactures permission. Each one takes a silence or an uncertainty and converts it into a license.

The first dresses rebellion in holy clothing. To participate in creation, in the way Scripture means it, is to work with the grain of what God made, a husband and a wife, a field and a harvest. It is never about overriding the body you were given. The note takes the oldest offer ever made to a human being, the promise that you may decide good and evil for yourself, and it calls that offer worship.

The second note is the one built to intimidate. Erroneous philosophical framing. It is meant to make a believer feel unqualified, as though the plain reading of the text were a kind of naivety. But notice what it quietly skips. Everyone is framing. Her brother did not step out of philosophy into pure truth. He traded one set of assumptions for another, a newer one that says the self inside is sovereign and the body is only clay. The question was never whether to use a lens. The question is which lens tells the truth about what a person is.

The third note is a syllogism, and it collapses when you press it. Scripture does not name every distortion. It does something better. It lays down a design so clear and so positive that it does not require a list of exceptions. Male and female, made in the image of God, the body received as a gift and not fought as an enemy. You do not need a verse forbidding every departure when the blueprint itself is that definite. And the appeal to absence cuts the other way. In a book that speaks openly about the body, about marriage, about desire, on nearly every page, the total absence of one affirming word is not a space waiting to be filled. It is an answer.

Here is what I had to learn the hard way, and what I want you to learn faster.

Her brother is not an enemy. The child I love is not an enemy. The church keeps reaching for its sharpest argument, as if the goal were to win a war against the person in the room. But the person in the room is usually not an opponent. He is a captive. Someone handed him a permission slip and told him it was a key. He believes it will open a door to himself. It will not. It opens onto a hallway of grief, and many who walk it say so only later, quietly, when the cameras are gone.

We do not out-argue a captive into freedom. We tell him the truth, and we stay close enough that the truth has somewhere warm to land.

So, finally, what do I do? The sister’s question. Maybe yours.

Do not go silent, and do not go to war. Those are the two easy exits, and both of them abandon the person. The silence calls itself peace. The fighting calls itself conviction. Both of them leave him alone with the lie.

Stay in the room. Keep showing up in his life, keep calling, keep the relationship intact, because a relationship is the only structure strong enough to carry hard truth without snapping. If you burn it down in one righteous conversation, you will have nothing left to carry anything.

Say what is true. You do not have to be the one who brings it up, and you should not go looking for the fight. But when it surfaces, and it will, do not step around it. He already knows where you stand. What he needs to see is that your honesty and your love are not two separate things he has to choose between.

And pray, even when the praying falls apart. There will be nights when you have no words left, when you have said everything to God that can be said and the sentence will simply not form. That is not the failure of prayer. When you have run out of words, the Spirit has not. He intercedes for you with groanings too deep to be spoken (Rom. 8:26-27), carrying to the Father exactly what your exhausted heart means but cannot say. A parent watching a grown child stand far away may pray that wordless prayer more than any other. It is heard. It is the prayer of the Spirit Himself, and it does not depend on your strength to hold it up.

Your brother is not too far. The child I love is not too far. No one is past the reach of the One who made them, made them on purpose, and does not make mistakes with bodies or with souls.

I still have those three sentences. I keep them close. They remind me to be honest, to be unafraid, and to not leave the room.

---

I publish here regularly to give you biblical clarity in a collapsing world. If this piece served you, become a paid subscriber and help keep the work going. If this is not the season for that, share it with someone carrying a heartbreak like the sister in this story.

---

Writing produced by the author, with limited use of digital tools for editing and clarity.

---