Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rod D. Martin's avatar

I did cheer O.J.'s acquittal. Actually threw a party: "O.J. Simpson Liberation Day!"

But there's context.

I was in law school. I watched the case. I was convinced that the prosecution had not made its case. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is a pretty high bar they did NOT meet, and so though I thought he was probably guilty (and he was), I celebrated that in America, we really would rather ten guilty men go free than one man hang, and the system still worked.

I still feel that way.

Still, I was deeply disturbed by my many black classmates who didn't care anything about that. They were cheering harder for that acquittal than I was, but they didn't care about criminal procedure (despite many of them probably doing better in that class than I did). They just cared that the black guy got off.

In the 1980s we had a blissful absence of racism. It existed but everyone agreed it was wrong, at least in our age group (there were exceptions among the parents for sure). People had taken the "I Have a Dream" speech to heart. It was the overwhelming consensus nationally, but especially among the generation that was born after it. There were still cultural differences, but people actively sought to minimize them and include each other. I once saw a white redneck football player use the N-word (this was middle school!), and five other white redneck football players beat him up right in front of me. It was a really special time.

So the disquieting part about what I saw was the new tribalism. It was different in kind from people grouping up in the lunch room a decade earlier. It was filled with seething and malice and joy of the kind that wasn't "the prosecution didn't do its job, so the system worked" but rather "the black guy got off! We beat the system!"

No, guys. The system worked the way it's supposed to work, so a guilty man walked because we weren't sure "beyond a reasonable doubt" so we weren't willing to take his freedom or his life. The "system" you hate (which King did not, despite pointing out its failings) is exactly what saved the man you obviously believe to be guilty. Why can't you see that?

Rodney King was a turning point of a certain kind. His case was kind of like one in which a prostitute gets raped: the rapist needs to hang, but that doesn't exactly make the victim innocent. Life is full of situations like that. Sometimes everyone involved is wrong, just one person is more wrong. And the rioters were even more wrong than either King or the cops. What lunacy thinks the answer to injustice is to burn down your neighbors' houses and stores? It's a Satanic madness. But at least they were sticking up (in their twisted way) for someone who really did not deserve what he got.

O.J. was different. He should have been acquitted, but not because he didn't deserve death. The part of the system tasked with proving his guilt did a bad job of it, period. But no one actually thought he didn't do it.

Yet they didn't care. Because he was part of their group. So they cheered. Not because the system worked correctly -- it did -- but because the murderer got away with it.

And that was a turning point of an entirely different kind.

Brian Fitch's avatar

Your comment about someone (a journalist) profiting from a story (clicks, attention, financial gain) for a moment while those involved are impacted for a lifetime is a painful commentary on our hearts as a society.

We have exchanged God’s justice in order to worship the idols of the laws and courts of man. Proverbs 17:15 and other verses should guide us, not man’s jurisprudence. Blackstone’s ratio provides a Christian legal understanding that if we were not sure of guilt, we would trust God to carry out justice. Our court system has become a place “legally” impose our will and preferences. Man’s ways are evil and cause great pain.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?